At the Civil War’s outset, Kentucky’s declaration of neutrality forced Tennessee into the position of occupying the Confederacy’s western frontier. Unable at that early stage to advance north to the Ohio River, arguably the natural boundary between North and South, Confederate officials looking to fortify the nautical highways of the Cumberland and Tennessee Rivers were forced to look for suitable sites as close to the Kentucky–Tennessee boundary as possible. Thus, site selection for Forts Henry and Donelson was driven as much by political considerations as military strategy.

Construction on Fort Henry, built on the lower bank of the Tennessee River immediately south of the Kentucky line, began in early July and was finished in August. The site was less than desirable, dominated by hills on the Kentucky side of the river — one engineer rhetorically asked whether “a less favorable place” could have been chosen — causing the initial survey team to lodge an official objection to the choice. The five-sided, bastioned earthwork fortification mounted 17 heavy guns — including one 10-inch Columbiad capable of firing round shots weighing 128 pounds. Most guns were mounted on fully pivoting seacoast artillery carriages. Although they would ultimately prove ineffectual, a series of “torpedoes” were submerged in the main shipping channel. While the fort boasted two-mile unobstructed downriver views, it was situated within the swampy floodplain. Once both sides of the conflict had violated Kentucky’s neutrality in the autumn, a second defensive position was begun on the facing hilltops to augment the defenses, but no guns would ever be mounted at Fort Heiman.